When it comes to the aerodynamics of automobiles, you may believe the more teardrop-shaped the vehicle, the more slippery it is. Conversely, you’d presume cars and trucks with squared-off, brick-ish designs don’t fare well during drag coefficient testing. You’d be half-right. 

You’d likely not bat an eye to learn that, say, the 2006 Jeep Wrangler Rubicon soft top has a drag coefficient (Cd) of 0.58—which is slightly worse than the average cow’s drag coefficient of 0.50. But more surprising is that the curvaceous 1979 Volkswagen Beetle has a 0.48Cd. Not all streamlined shapes are wind tunnel champions.

In recent years, aerodynamics has taken on significantly more importance because of the rise of EVs, the concurrent anxiety about range, and the simple math that a car with less drag uses less energy, meaning that you won’t have to charge the battery so often, meaning that manufacturers can say that their EVs are a hair more efficient with more range than their competitors. In racing contexts, too, aerodynamics is important, but less in terms of energy consumption than in increasing downforce, for better grip when cornering. That’s been a focus in Formula 1, for example, since the 1960s. Decades before that, among production cars, designers were building aerodynamic gas cars with an eye on efficiency much like designers are doing today with EVs.

The following 7 automobiles aren’t the most aerodynamic vehicles ever made but they are the most interesting production ones.